Harassing fellow bloggers

stop it

Published on May 26, 2005 By KarmaGirl In Blogging

I have recently read a bunch of threads that are nothing but pure harassment of fellow bloggers. These type of threads are completely in violation of the Terms of Use of this site.

If I see these types of threads in the future, they will be removed from the forums.

This type of behavior is not acceptable. People should be able to blog here without being harassed.

Comments (Page 2)

stutefish

on May 26, 2005

Me, I'm an argumentative fellow. Nothing like a heated debate to get the old circulation flowing, I always say.

So, while I can count on little_whip to be stupendously annoying in every single post, it would never occur to me to complain that I'm being harassed. I simply assume that I come across as equally annoying to L_W, and that we both find some kind of perverse pleasure in being annoyed by each other's remarks.

JFJ, on the other hand, gets nothing but bannination from me. I have faith in KarmaGirl's judgement, and in her ability to distinguish between the two.

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

The winning name (which did not originate in JU) was Darth Meeps.

I figured there would be a meeps in there!

bakerstreet

on May 26, 2005

Frankly, Gene, if I wanted any of your crap I'd squeeze your head. Keep banging the troll button and take what you get like a, well, like the human you are...

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

Personally, I consider B.S.'s going from thread to thread continuing his crusade to be harassment. He just doesn't have enough sense to let it go. He apparently thinks it is more important to keep it alive.

Personally, I think you need to take a chill pill. I dont know what you have against half the members here, but you do seem to want to harpoon instead of discuss.

I expect better of you than that.

Ionolast

on May 26, 2005

What Dr. Guy said. You can't seem to let it go, Gene. You even come over here on KG's article and do the very thing that she's referring to.

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

As for having something against "half the members" here. There are thousands of members. I challenge you to support that statement.

I did not mean that literally. just figuratively. As your conflagaration grew, so did your black list. And it made me wonder why?

That is all I meant.

Why?

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

What Dr. Guy said. You can't seem to let it go, Gene. You even come over here on KG's article and do the very thing that she's referring to.

Icon, I do wonder why for those that seem to be so rational. I accuse nothing. But Gene has been a good debater and I just wonder why he has gone so far off on this issue.

yes, I want to know. I do not want to prolong it.

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

There can be no response if there is nothing to respond to.

I wish you would reconsider it.

bakerstreet

on May 26, 2005

Urm, Gene, if I wanted to refer to you in particular I don't think I'd need to be subtle about it. I was just pointing out that many people think referring to another article in any way is "retaliation", which it isn't. The reason it came to mind was because you had accused me of it in PB's case, sure, but I'm not the kind of guy that needs to bitch about you in third person.

Your vanity aside, if you have to wonder if I am talking about you in particular, then I'm not. When I decide to address you, I'll make sure you know I am talking about you.

Sugaree

on May 26, 2005

And you left WC's board for this B Street?

btw, Hi Sweet Thing! Purrrr...

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

So, I'm just supposed to take whatever people want to toss and take it? I don't think so. He made a comment. I responded -- and will continue to if necessary -- that could be the end of it. It all depends.

No, but you can laugh it off. No one is saying take it. We are saying let it go.

Dr Guy

on May 26, 2005

Even you do not deny that was the gist of your comment -- that you had been accused of that. Since you know I am the one who said it, it's disingenuous to then say the comment has no relation to me. I would think you are smart enough, given my reaction on LW's thread, that you would know if I saw it I would respond.

Gene, there is a time to stand and fight, and a time to let it go.

let it go. Seriously. It is not worth your trouble. It is done.

bakerstreet

on May 26, 2005

Gene, I hereby respectfully request that you leave me on your blacklist forever, as witnessed by all present.

Ionolast

on May 26, 2005

I'm beginning to think KG had an ulterior motive in allowing replies here.

Gene Nash

on May 27, 2005

Gene, I hereby respectfully request that you leave me on your blacklist forever, as witnessed by all present.

Gladly done.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!